Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
Date: 2023-05-21 15:34:00
Message-ID: ZGo56LUbAw0Qt5pd@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 08:22:05AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 07:44:49AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 08:00:15AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Maybe
> >>
> >> createuser --with-members
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >> createuser --member-of
> >>
> >> would be clearer.
> >
> > Those seem like reasonable choices to me. I suspect we'll want to keep
> > --role around for backward compatibility.
>
> I've attached a draft patch for this. I also changed --admin to
> --with-admin.

If we want to go forward with this, the big question is whether we want
to get this in before beta1. FYI, the release notes don't mention the
option names.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Only you can decide what is important to you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-05-21 15:45:24 Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-05-21 15:22:05 Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16