| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg |
| Date: | 2023-05-19 13:44:36 |
| Message-ID: | ZGd9RBmbg68OCymS@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 09:42:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
> > I would also prefer a GUC named gss_accept_delegation, but the current
> > name matches the libpq gssdeleg connection parameter and the PGSSDELEG
> > environment variable. Maybe there's something to be said for keeping
> > those three things alike?
>
> +1 for spelling it out in all user-visible names. I do not think
> that that GSS-API C symbol is a good precedent to follow.
Once nice bonus of the release notes is that it allows us to see the new
API in one place to check for consistency.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-05-19 14:31:40 | Re: PG 16 draft release notes ready |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-19 13:42:00 | Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg |