Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Date: 2023-05-17 01:25:04
Message-ID: ZGQs8Ipaec0x+5yR@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 06:00:00PM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> I can confirm that the patches improve (restore) performance for my test:
> pgbench -i benchdb
> pgbench -c 10 -T 300 benchdb

Thanks for running these!

> tps (over three runs):
> HEAD (08c45ae23):
> 10238.441580, 10697.202119, 10706.764703
>
> HEAD with the patches:
> 11134.510118, 11176.554996, 11150.338488
>
> f193883fc~1 (240e0dbac)
> 11082.561388, 11233.604446, 11087.071768
>
> 15.3 (8382864eb)
> 11328.699555, 11128.057883, 11057.934392

The numbers between f193883fc~1 and HEAD+patch are close to each
other. It does not seem to make the whole difference with 15.3, but
most of it. The difference can also be explained with some noise,
based on the number patterns of the third runs?

I have now applied the revert, ready for beta1. Thanks for the
feedback!
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2023-05-17 01:47:51 Reload configuration more frequently in apply worker.
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-05-17 01:18:26 Re: [DOC] Update ALTER SUBSCRIPTION documentation v3