| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Removing 32 bit support starting from PG17++ |
| Date: | 2023-05-24 22:25:03 |
| Message-ID: | ZG6Ov16IbSkaxZAw@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:44:11AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net> writes:
> > This inspired me to propose dropping 32bit support for PostgreSQL starting with PG17.
>
> I don't think this is a great idea. Even if Intel isn't interested,
> there'll be plenty of 32-bit left in the lower end of the market
> (think ARM, IoT, and so on).
A few examples of that are the first models of the Raspberry PIs,
which are still produced (until 2026 actually for the first model).
These rely on ARMv6 if I recall correctly, which are 32b.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tejasvi Kashi | 2023-05-24 22:28:57 | Re: SyncRepWaitForLSN waits for XLogFlush? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-05-24 22:18:15 | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |