Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Date: 2023-05-11 04:28:40
Message-ID: ZFxu+IWkQpJhZkB3@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 09:48:24AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2023-05-08 12:11:17 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I can reproduce a significant regression due to f193883fc of a workload just
>> running
>> SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
>>
>> A single session running it on my workstation via pgbench -Mprepared gets
>> before:
>> tps = 89359.128359 (without initial connection time)
>> after:
>> tps = 83843.585152 (without initial connection time)
>>
>> Obviously this is an extreme workload, but that nevertheless seems too large
>> to just accept...
>
> Added an open item for this.

Thanks for the report, I'll come back to it and look at it at the
beginning of next week. In the worst case, that would mean a revert
of this refactoring, I assume.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-05-11 04:56:52 Re: walsender performance regression due to logical decoding on standby changes
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-05-11 04:24:05 Re: Redundant strlen(query) in get_rel_infos