Re: refactoring basebackup.c

From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date: 2023-04-12 14:57:51
Message-ID: ZDbG77gXJLTHfo3V@telsasoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:46:37AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:11 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:09 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > BaseBackupSync is not documented
> > > > BaseBackupWrite is not documented
> > >
> > > [Resending with trimmed CC: list, because the mailing list told me to
> > > due to a blocked account, sorry if you already got the above.]
> >
> > Bummer. I'll write a patch to fix that tomorrow, unless somebody beats me to it.
>
> Here's a patch for that, and a patch to add the missing error check
> Peter noticed.

I think these maybe got forgotten ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexandr Nikulin 2023-04-12 15:00:07 Re: Improve the performance of nested loop join in the case of partitioned inner table
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-12 14:57:17 Re: Wrong results from Parallel Hash Full Join