| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
| Date: | 2023-04-07 14:55:58 |
| Message-ID: | ZDAu/lrecG7mrwbQ@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 04:14:13AM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2023-Apr-06, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > +ERROR: relation "c" already exists
>
> Do you intend to make an error here ?
These still look like mistakes in the tests.
> Also, I think these table names may be too generic, and conflict with
> other parallel tests, now or in the future.
>
> > +create table d(a int not null, f1 int) inherits(inh_p3, c);
> > +ERROR: relation "d" already exists
> Sadly, the binary-upgrade mode is a bit of a mess and thus the
> pg_upgrade test is failing.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-04-07 14:58:25 | Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-04-07 14:55:19 | Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests |