Re: cursor use vs pg_stat_statements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cursor use vs pg_stat_statements
Date: 2023-04-06 22:33:11
Message-ID: ZC9Ip7b9VlbgSuY3@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 09:53:38AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Try again with autocommit turned off. Sorry, I omitted that crucial
> detail. Exact test code attached (name/password removed)

For the same of the archives, this should be OK now under 1d477a9.
See also this thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/EBE6C507-9EB6-4142-9E4D-38B1673363A7@amazon.com
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message reid.thompson 2023-04-06 22:35:38 Re: Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends.
Previous Message Yurii Rashkovskii 2023-04-06 22:17:05 Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen