Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol
Date: 2023-04-06 00:39:36
Message-ID: ZC4UyMRZZT2U18n7@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 10:16:19PM +0000, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
> Here is v6. That was my mistake not to zero out the es_total_processed.
> I had it in the first version.

The update of es_total_processed in standard_ExecutorRun() felt a bit
lonely, so I have added an extra comment, ran an indentation, and
applied the result. Thanks Sami for the patch, and everyone else for
the feedback!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-06 00:41:48 Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-04-06 00:39:35 Re: [BUG] pg_stat_statements and extended query protocol