| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add n_tup_newpage_upd to pg_stat table views |
| Date: | 2023-03-23 00:24:12 |
| Message-ID: | ZBucLCxjnhWfe5ul@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 05:14:08PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> * Small adjustments to the documentation.
>
> Nearby related items were tweaked slightly to make everything fit
> together a bit better. For example, the description of n_tup_hot_upd
> is revised to make it obvious that n_tup_hot_upd counts row updates
> that can never get counted under the new n_tup_newpage_upd counter.
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ typedef struct PgStat_TableCounts
PgStat_Counter t_tuples_updated;
PgStat_Counter t_tuples_deleted;
PgStat_Counter t_tuples_hot_updated;
+ PgStat_Counter t_tuples_newpage_updated;
bool t_truncdropped;
I have in the works something that's going to rename these fields to
not have the "t_" prefix anymore, to ease some global refactoring in
pgstatfuncs.c so as we have less repetitive code with the functions
that grab these counters. I don't think that's something you need to
name without the prefix here, just a FYI that this is going to be
immediately renamed ;)
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-03-23 00:30:03 | Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete() |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-03-23 00:16:09 | Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns |