Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove nonmeaningful prefixes in PgStat_* fields
Date: 2023-03-23 00:09:37
Message-ID: ZBuYwYuzVynLEGmh@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 02:52:23PM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> This comment still has the t_ prefix as does the one for tuples_updated
> and deleted.
>
> otherwise, LGTM.

Good catch. pgstat_count_heap_update() has a t_tuples_hot_updated,
and pgstat_update_heap_dead_tuples() a t_delta_dead_tuples on top of
the three you have just reported.

I have grepped for all the fields renamed, and nothing else stands
out. However, my eyes don't have a 100% accuracy, either.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-03-23 00:13:03 Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-03-23 00:05:10 Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns