Re: Combine pg_walinspect till_end_of_wal functions with others

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Combine pg_walinspect till_end_of_wal functions with others
Date: 2023-03-15 09:50:01
Message-ID: ZBGUySrAaGgRRuPG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:40:17PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> -1 for removing \dx+ for pg_walinspect version 1.0, because we wanted
> to show the diff of functions along with testing the upgrade path in
> the oldextversions.sql. Therefore, I prefer something like [1]:

This is a duplicate of what describe.c uses, with a COLLATE clause.
The main goal was to have a simple check, so I'd still stand by the
simplest choice and move on.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-03-15 09:58:41 Re: CI and test improvements
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-03-15 09:38:34 Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name