Re: Combine pg_walinspect till_end_of_wal functions with others

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Combine pg_walinspect till_end_of_wal functions with others
Date: 2023-03-10 10:21:54
Message-ID: ZAsEws+qv/KlkiXT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 04:37:23PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> isn't '0/0' the same as InvalidXLogRecPtr? but my point is that we
> shouldn't require to spell it explicitly, just rely on the default value.

Perhaps. Still the addition of a DEFAULT to the function definitions
and its value looks like a second patch to me. The first should just
lift the bound restrictions currently in place while cleaning up the
till_* functions.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2023-03-10 10:28:30 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message John Naylor 2023-03-10 10:03:04 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2