| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? | 
| Date: | 2025-02-19 01:12:48 | 
| Message-ID: | Z7UwEEbiuV0m6PJR@jrouhaud | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www | 
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> The spam filtering[1] that occurs for the header information appears to
> >> have been applied to the bottom link as well - making it 404. Not sure
> >> where that is getting applied, but doing a "raw source" and checking my
> >> original inbox seems to indicate the link at the bottom of the email was
> >> sent unobscured.
>
> > FWIW I confirm that I did send a valid / unobscured link.
>
> IME the trick to keeping this from happening is to manually convert
> any "@" characters in the URL you send to "%40".  Usually if you
> copy-and-paste from your browser address bar that happens for free.
That's what I usually do.  I guess that time I just copied the link from some
email header.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2025-02-19 03:01:08 | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-19 00:51:01 | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? |