| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: add missing PQfinish() calls to vacuumdb |
| Date: | 2025-02-05 00:36:00 |
| Message-ID: | Z6KycK2M3o2hDq3f@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 10:30:58AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I noticed that vacuum_one_database() doesn't call PQfinish() before
> pg_fatal() in a few of the server version checks. I seem to have
> unintentionally established this precedent in commit 00d1e88. Michael
> claimed to have fixed it before committing [0], but that seems to have been
> missed, too. I don't think this is a huge problem, but it does seem nicer
> to properly close the connection before exiting. If there are no
> objections, I plan to commit and back-patch the attached patch shortly.
>
> [0] https://postgr.es/m/20190108020300.GH22498%40paquier.xyz
Indeed. It looks like my fingers have slipped during a rebase for
this one, or something like that. The incorrect pattern has spread
later in ae78cae3be62, not 4211fbd8413b.
Thanks for the fix, Nathan.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-02-05 00:38:50 | Re: new commitfest transition guidance |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-02-05 00:29:48 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |