| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Date: | 2025-01-06 21:27:18 |
| Message-ID: | Z3xKtmHxPpHNyqfH@nathan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 03:45:03PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 12:02:47PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> I suggest that we make a new thread about the vacuumdb changes and
>> focus this thread and patch series on the pg_dump changes (and minor
>> flag adjustments to pg_upgrade).
>>
>> Unless you think that the pg_dump changes should block on the vacuumdb
>> changes? In which case please let me know because the pg_dump changes
>> are otherwise close to commit.
>
> I think that is a good idea. I don't see vacuumdb blocking this.
+1, I've been reviewing the vacuumdb portion and am planning to start a new
thread in the near future. IIUC the bulk of the vacuumdb changes are
relatively noncontroversial, we just haven't reached consensus on the user
interface.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2025-01-06 21:27:31 | Re: Doc: fix the rewrite condition when executing ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-01-06 21:15:21 | Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan |