| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fix early elog(FATAL) |
| Date: | 2024-12-14 04:16:39 |
| Message-ID: | Z10Gp-ryW44JGnYo@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:14:43PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:15:05PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I don't feel strongly either way. I did write it the option-1 way originally.
>> Then I started thinking about changes at a distance causing the other
>> InitProcessGlobals() tasks to palloc or elog. We could do option-1 in master
>> and keep the back branches in their current state.
>
> I don't feel strongly either way, either. I don't think it's important
> enough to diverge from the back-branches.
Also, thank you for fixing this.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2024-12-14 05:08:57 | Re: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm. |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-12-14 04:14:43 | Re: Fix early elog(FATAL) |