Re: pg_upgrade test failure

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test failure
Date: 2022-10-03 00:40:20
Message-ID: YzovdL3lqhmorvl0@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:10:06PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I think something like the attached should do the right thing for
> STATUS_DELETE_PENDING (sort of "ENOENT-in-progress"). unlink() goes
> back to being blocking (sleep+retry until eventually we reach ENOENT
> or we time out and give up with EACCES), but we still distinguish it
> from true ENOENT so we have a fast exit in that case. This is passing
> CI, but not tested yet.

if (lstat(path, &st) < 0)
- return -1;
+ {
+ if (lstat_error_was_status_delete_pending())
+ is_lnk = false;
+ else
+ return -1;
+ }
+ else
+ is_lnk = S_ISLNK(st.st_mode);
Sorry, I don't remember all the details in this area, but a directory
can never be marked as STATUS_DELETE_PENDING with some of its contents
still inside, right? If it has some contents, forcing unlink() all
the time would be fine?

> One ugly thing in this patch is that it has to deal with our
> historical mistake (?) of including Windows headers in this file in
> Cygwin builds for no reason and thus getting WIN32 defined on a
> non-WIN32 build, as I've complained about before[1] but not yet tidied
> up.

Your proposal remains local to dirmod.c, so that does not sound like a
big deal to me for the time being.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-10-03 03:03:12 Re: pg_upgrade test failure
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-10-02 23:10:06 Re: pg_upgrade test failure

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-03 00:45:22 Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2022-10-03 00:19:35 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v13