Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Date: 2022-09-30 00:12:56
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:39:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The assertions in TupleDescInitEntry would have caught that,
> if only utils/misc/pg_controldata.c had more than zero test coverage.
> Seems like somebody ought to do something about that.

While passing by, I have noticed this thread. We don't really care
about the contents returned by these functions, and one simple trick
to check their execution is SELECT FROM. Like in the attached, for

Attachment Content-Type Size
controldata-regression.patch text/x-diff 1.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-09-30 00:31:35 Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2022-09-30 00:08:02 Small miscellaneous fixes