Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Date: 2022-09-30 01:23:38
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> While passing by, I have noticed this thread. We don't really care
> about the contents returned by these functions, and one simple trick
> to check their execution is SELECT FROM. Like in the attached, for
> example.

Hmmm ... I'd tend to do SELECT COUNT(*) FROM. But can't we provide
any actual checks on the sanity of the output? I realize that the
output's far from static, but still ...

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo NAGATA 2022-09-30 01:23:42 Re: BUG #17434: CREATE/DROP DATABASE can be executed in the same transaction with other commands
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-09-30 01:23:34 Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why