Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"
Date: 2022-09-29 05:33:06
Message-ID: YzUuEtM306eDRZ6w@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 04:45:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Good point. Thanks for the patch, this looks consistent!

Done as of 5ac9e86.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-09-29 06:02:32 Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes?
Previous Message David Rowley 2022-09-29 05:30:31 Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types