Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test
Date: 2022-09-28 07:24:44
Message-ID: YzP2vBC1uBGEDRM6@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:12:57AM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Maybe the variable name should be system_user instead or should we use
> another way to get the "SYSTEM_USER" to be used in the map?

Hmm, indeed. It would be more reliable to rely on the contents
returned by getpeereid()/getpwuid() after one successful peer
connection, then use it in the map. I was wondering whether using
stuff like getpwuid() in the perl script itself would be better, but
it sounds less of a headache in terms of portability to just rely on
authn_id via SYSTEM_USER to generate the contents of the correct map.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-09-28 07:45:17 Re: [small patch] Change datatype of ParallelMessagePending from "volatile bool" to "volatile sig_atomic_t"
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-09-28 07:12:57 Re: [PATCH] Add peer authentication TAP test