Re: Setting log_connection in connection string doesn't work

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Setting log_connection in connection string doesn't work
Date: 2022-08-17 14:30:16
Message-ID: Yvz7eJILMVWkzsbU@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:29:26AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > This patch is from October of 2021. I don't see any commitfest entry
> > for it. Should it be applied?
>
> I think we decided not to. The original argument for having these
> be PGC_SU_BACKEND was to try to ensure that you got matching
> connection and disconnection log entries for any one session,
> and I don't see anything that supersedes that plan.

Okay, thanks for the feedback.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2022-08-17 14:46:16 Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-17 14:29:26 Re: Setting log_connection in connection string doesn't work