| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: doc: Clarify Savepoint Behavior |
| Date: | 2022-07-14 19:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | YtByML/PDMm1okkg@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022 at 12:59:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 09:14:56AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > So leave the "release" behavior implied from the rollback behavior?
> >
> > On the whole I'm slightly in favor of your proposed wording (mostly due to the
> > better fitting of the ROLLBACK command, though at the omission of RELEASE...)
> > but are you seeing anything beyond personal style as to why you feel one is
> > better than the other? Is there some existing wording in the docs that I
> > should be conforming to here?
>
> I have developed the attached patch based on the discussion here. I
> tried to simplify the language and example to clarify the intent.
>
> I was confused why the first part of the patch added a mention of
> releasing savepoints to the ROLLBACK TO manual page --- I have removed
> that and improved the text in RELEASE SAVEPOINT.
Patch applied to all supported versions.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-14 20:02:30 | Re: pg_parameter_aclcheck() and trusted extensions |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-07-14 19:34:54 | Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT |