Re: doc: Bring mention of unique index forced transaction wait behavior outside of the internal section

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: doc: Bring mention of unique index forced transaction wait behavior outside of the internal section
Date: 2022-07-14 19:18:11
Message-ID: YtBr8/Wwn0RyBT9N@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 05:22:41PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> > I was not happy with putting this in the Transaction Isolation section.
> > I rewrote it and put it in the INSERT secion, right before ON CONFLICT;
> > patch attached.
>
> Looks good.

Applied to all supported PG versions.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2022-07-14 19:34:54 Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2022-07-14 18:34:07 Re: Pre-allocating WAL files