Re: amcheck is using a wrong macro to check compressed-ness

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: amcheck is using a wrong macro to check compressed-ness
Date: 2022-06-22 01:56:26
Message-ID: YrJ2yg/9VPn83fMW@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:48:27AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Three weeks later, ping. Robert, could you look at this thread?

And again. beta2 is planned to next week, and this is still an open
item. I could look at that by myself, but I always tend to get easily
confused with all the VARATT macros when it comes to compressed blobs,
so it would take a bit of time.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2022-06-22 02:09:08 Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-06-22 01:41:51 Re: [BUG] Panic due to incorrect missingContrecPtr after promotion