| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-Master Logical Replication |
| Date: | 2022-05-26 02:32:50 |
| Message-ID: | Yo7m0hPxvCI5qMuj@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:13:17PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > You still have not answered my question above. "Without these features,
> > what workload would this help with?" You have only explained how the
> > patch would fix one of the many larger problems.
> >
>
> It helps with setting up logical replication among two or more nodes
> (data flows both ways) which is important for use cases where
> applications are data-aware. For such apps, it will be beneficial to
That does make sense, thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-05-26 02:35:06 | Re: "ERROR: latch already owned" on gharial |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-05-26 02:25:53 | Re: fix stats_fetch_consistency value in postgresql.conf.sample |