From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init |
Date: | 2022-05-10 08:55:12 |
Message-ID: | YnoocH8Tf93nXN3A@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 07:51:43PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 5:15 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:27:11AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> > +1, I'll put together a new patch set.
>>
>> As promised...
>
> Looks reasonable to me.
0001 looks sensible seen from here with this approach.
> Anyone else have thoughts?
I agree that removing support for the unloading part would be nice to
clean up now on HEAD. Note that 0002 is missing the removal of one
reference to _PG_fini in xfunc.sgml (<primary> markup).
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-05-10 08:58:59 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2022-05-10 08:37:24 | Re: Privileges on PUBLICATION |