Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)
Date: 2022-03-29 01:57:42
Message-ID: YkJnliFnXODscRJ/@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 02:34:44PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Just a thought: we could consider back-patching
> allow_in_place_tablespaces, after a little while, if we're happy with
> how that is working out, if it'd be useful for verifying bug fixes in
> back branches. It's non-end-user-facing testing infrastructure.

+1 for a backpatch on that. That would be useful.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-03-29 01:58:22 Re: MDAM techniques and Index Skip Scan patch
Previous Message wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com 2022-03-29 01:44:57 RE: Logical replication timeout problem