| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com" <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Changing "Hot Standby" to "hot standby" |
| Date: | 2022-03-11 06:18:37 |
| Message-ID: | YirpvR1CN6YpHI4P@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 05:58:05PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> Not sure why the previous emails didn't go through, and still doesn't
> look like they were picked up. In the interest of progress though,
> attaching an updated patch with some minor wordsmithing; lmk if you'd
> prefer this differently
Looks the same as v5 for me, that applies the same consistency rules
everywhere in the docs. So applied this one.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2022-03-11 06:22:44 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-03-11 06:03:18 | Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |