Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Date: 2022-02-14 06:40:23
Message-ID: Ygn5V7n4dmst2AO/@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 02:55:26PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-02-14 11:23:18 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> Ahh, right. I assume it still needs perl2host() treatment for MSYS2
>> systems, because jacana's log shows TESTDIR is set to a Unixoid path
>> that I assume pg_regress's runtime can't use. That leads to the
>> attached.
>
> Looks sane to me.

This looks like a nice cleanup, indeed. Nice catch.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-14 08:01:05 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-14 06:31:42 Re: pg_receivewal.exe unhandled exception in zlib1.dll