Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2022-02-11 17:50:49
Message-ID: Ygah+Qgo6/BkPTKl@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:35:50PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> How about something like LOG_AS_CLONE? That makes it clear, I hope,
> that we're logging it a different way, but that method of logging it
> is different in each case. You'd still have to read the documentation
> to find out what it really means, but at least it seems like it points
> you more in the right direction. To me, anyway.

I think CLONE would be confusing since we don't use that term often,
maybe LOG_DB_COPY or LOG_FILE_COPY?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sandro Santilli 2022-02-11 17:59:50 [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-02-11 17:43:31 Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample