Re: GUC flags

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: GUC flags
Date: 2022-02-09 01:19:09
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 01:06:29PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Makes sense. check_guc also checks after this pattern.

Okay, I have done all the adjustments you mentioned, added a couple of
comments and applied the patch. If the buildfarm is happy, I'll
go retire check_guc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-02-09 01:23:06 Re: pgsql: Avoid race in RelationBuildDesc() affecting CREATE INDEX CONCURR
Previous Message 2022-02-09 01:18:24 RE: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication