Re: pl/pgsql feature request: shorthand for argument and local variable references

From: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Jack Christensen <jack(at)jncsoftware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql feature request: shorthand for argument and local variable references
Date: 2022-01-06 07:02:39
Message-ID: YdaUD+ePLCZOs+eC@jrouhaud
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Pavel,

On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:09:13AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> I am continuing to talk with Hannu about syntax. I think so using the
> compile option is a good direction, but maybe renaming from "routine_label"
> to "topscope_label" (proposed by Hannu) or maybe "outerscope_label" can be
> a good idea.

It's not clear to me what is the status of this patch. You sent some updated
patch since with some typo fixes but I don't see any conclusion about the
direction this patch should go and/or how to name the new option.

Should the patch be reviewed or switched to Waiting on Author?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2022-01-06 07:23:18 Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)
Previous Message SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM 2022-01-06 07:00:10 Re: Throttling WAL inserts when the standby falls behind more than the configured replica_lag_in_bytes