Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Cc: "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index
Date: 2021-12-21 00:46:37
Message-ID: YcEj7dtzl80AN5ow@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 11:57:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> What do you think about the attached patch? It forbids the DROP INDEX. We might
> add a detail message but I didn't in this patch.

Yeah. I'd agree about doing something like that on HEAD, and that
would help with some of the logirep-related patch currently being
worked on, as far as I understood.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-12-21 00:53:02 Re: sequences vs. synchronous replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-12-21 00:43:43 Re: Refactoring of compression options in pg_basebackup