Re: Question about 001_stream_rep.pl recovery test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question about 001_stream_rep.pl recovery test
Date: 2021-12-13 12:05:04
Message-ID: Ybc28Bx+9YbaPh3D@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 01:44:40PM -0800, David Zhang wrote:
> Inside the test script `src/test/recovery/t/001_stream_rep.pl`, a comment at
> line 30 says `my_backup` is "not mandatory",
>
>  30 # Take backup of standby 1 (not mandatory, but useful to check if
>  31 # pg_basebackup works on a standby).
>  32 $node_standby_1->backup($backup_name);
>
> however if remove the backup folder "my_backup" after line 32, something
> like below,

Well, the comment is not completely incorrect IMO. In this context, I
read taht that we don't need a backup from a standby and we could just
take a backup from the primary instead. If I were to fix something, I
would suggest to reword the comment as follows:
# Take backup of standby 1 (could be taken from the primary, but this
# is useful to check if pg_basebackup works on a standby).

> And then the test script takes another backup `my_backup_2`, but it seems
> this backup is not used anywhere.

This had better stay around, per commit f267c1c. And as far as I can
see, we don't have an equivalent test in a different place, where
pg_basebackup runs on a standby while its *primary* is stopped.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com 2021-12-13 12:18:15 RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-12-13 10:53:43 Re: Assertion failure with replication origins and PREPARE TRANSACTIOn