Re: Skip vacuum log report code in lazy_scan_heap() if possible

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skip vacuum log report code in lazy_scan_heap() if possible
Date: 2021-12-04 04:35:17
Message-ID: YarwBYR+GDY9dofy@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 05:46:51PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> Perhaps this patch should be marked Rejected in favor of that one,
> then.

Let's do so, then. I can also get behind the coverage argument for
this code path.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-12-04 05:18:32 Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2021-12-04 04:21:08 Re: A test for replay of regression tests