| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal starting position |
| Date: | 2021-10-21 07:21:44 |
| Message-ID: | YXEVCE7Td5WxTVpg@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:29:54AM +0200, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
> Ok, do you want me to propose a different patch for previous versions ?
That's not necessary. Thanks for proposing.
> Do you mean restart_lsn as the pointer argument to the function, or
> restart_lsn as the field returned by the command ? If it's the first, I'll
> change it but if it's the latter it is expected that we sometime run this on a
> slot where WAL has never been reserved yet.
restart_lsn as the pointer of the function.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-10-21 08:34:45 | Re: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress |
| Previous Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-10-21 06:58:06 | RE: Added schema level support for publication. |