Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests
Date: 2021-10-12 02:20:31
Message-ID: YWTw7/
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:48:54AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I would say:
> This should be incremented by any subroutine which directly or
> indirectly calls test routines from Test::More, such as ok() or
> is().

Indeed, that looks better. I have just used that and applied the
change down to 12 where we have begun playing with level

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2021-10-12 02:22:14 Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2021-10-12 02:09:03 Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname