Re: Toast compression method options

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Toast compression method options
Date: 2021-10-01 07:12:27
Message-ID: YVa028Lj99Eqtckt@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:10:22PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I haved rebased the patch.

Please note that the patch does not apply. FWIW, I still don't think
that this is a good idea to have that. I don't recall seeing much on
this list that users would like to have such a level of tuning for
pglz, while lz4 only offers the option to reduce the compression rate
while being already very cheap in CPU so the impact is limited. On
top of that, this adds a new attribute to pg_attribute with much more
complexity into ALTER TABLE code paths in tablecmds.c..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema 2021-10-01 07:14:05 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add ETIMEDOUT to ALL_CONNECTION_FAILURE_ERRNOS
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-10-01 07:10:49 Re: postgres_fdw: Handle boolean comparison predicates