Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests
Date: 2021-09-27 23:43:13
Message-ID: YVJXEf119KrJDFdq@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 04:19:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I tried the same thing (i.e., re-enable bloom's TAP test) on my laptop
> just now, and it passed fine. The laptop is not exactly the same
> as longfin was in 2018, but it ought to be close enough. Not sure
> what to make of that --- maybe the failure is only intermittent,
> or else we fixed the underlying issue since then.

Honestly, I have no idea what change in the backend matters here. And
it is not like bloom has changed in any significant way since d3c09b9.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-09-27 23:53:35 Re: typos (and more)
Previous Message Rachel Heaton 2021-09-27 23:07:19 Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend