Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))"

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: strange case of "if ((a & b))"
Date: 2021-09-11 05:44:11
Message-ID: YTxCKyFgrxQ1tF0P@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 02:14:50PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I can see several instances of the
> "eval-bool ? true : false" pattern after fd0625c7a9 that are not in
> the latest 0002.

Yep. There are more of these, and I have just looked at some of them
as of the patches proposed. What was sent looked clean enough to
progress a bit and be done with it.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2021-09-11 05:52:10 Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Previous Message Jian Guo 2021-09-11 05:02:42 Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression