Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Marek Szuba <marecki(at)gentoo(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Date: 2021-09-01 09:21:58
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Tom Lane
> I did not like confusing the RISC-V case with the ARM case: duplicating
> the code block seems better, in case there's ever reason to add
> arch-specific stuff like SPIN_DELAY. So I split it off to its own
> code block and pushed it.

Fwiw I can report success on Debian's riscv port with that commit
cherry-picked onto 13.4:


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 2021-09-01 09:23:48 RE: Parallel Inserts (WAS: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks..)
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2021-09-01 09:19:47 Re: Patch: shouldn't timezone(text, timestamp[tz]) be STABLE?