| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some RELKIND macro refactoring |
| Date: | 2021-08-17 02:59:53 |
| Message-ID: | YRsmKXf2/MMjReoI@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:22:50AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Partitioned tables are not listed here, but IIRC there's a patch to let
> partitioned tables have a table AM so that their partitions inherit it.
This was raised in the thread for ALTER TABLE SET ACCESS METHOD (see
patch 0002):
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210308010707.GA29832@telsasoft.com
I am not sure whether we'd want to do that for table AMs as
property inheritance combined with partitioned tables has always been
a sensitive topic for any properties, but if we discuss this it should
be on a new thread.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Nancarrow | 2021-08-17 03:00:07 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| Previous Message | Wenjing | 2021-08-17 02:30:41 | Re: Is it worth pushing conditions to sublink/subplan? |