Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Teach pg_receivewal to use lz4 compression
Date: 2021-07-12 05:56:03
Message-ID: YOvZcxqZSX8Rjj0R@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 11:10:24AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 7:48 PM <gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me> wrote:
>> We can, though I am not in favour of doing so. There is seemingly
>> little benefit for added complexity.
>
> I am really not sure what complexity you are talking about, do you
> mean since with pglz we were already providing the compression level
> so let it be as it is but with the new compression method you don't
> see much benefit of providing compression level or speed?

You mean s/pglz/zlib/ here perhaps? I am not sure what Georgios has
in mind, but my opinion stands on the latter: there is little benefit
in making lz4 faster than the default and reduce compression, as the
default is already a rather low CPU user.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2021-07-12 06:06:01 Re: More time spending with "delete pending"
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-07-12 05:52:30 Re: More time spending with "delete pending"