| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory |
| Date: | 2021-06-24 05:33:59 |
| Message-ID: | YNQZRz4G9HjNbVfh@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:25:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Okay, I'll change this in back branches and HEAD to keep the code
>> consistent, or do you think it is better to retain the order in HEAD
>> as it is and just change it for back-branches?
>
> As I said, I'd keep the natural ordering in HEAD.
Yes, please keep the items in an alphabetical order on HEAD, and just
have the new item at the bottom of the enum in the back-branches.
That's the usual practice.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-24 05:56:04 | Re: [PATCH] Make jsonapi usable from libpq |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-06-24 04:25:15 | Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory |