| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? |
| Date: | 2021-06-04 05:24:51 |
| Message-ID: | YLm5I9MCGz4SnPdX@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 08:54:48AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have done no recompression here, so I was just stressing the extra
> test for the recompression. Sorry for the confusion.
I am not sure yet which way we are going, but cleaning up this code
involves a couple of things:
- Clean up the docs.
- Update one of the tests of compression.sql, with its alternate
output.
- Clean up of reform_and_rewrite_tuple() where the rewrite is done.
So that would give the attached.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| vacuum-no-recompress.patch | text/x-diff | 6.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-04 05:58:13 | Re: alter table set TABLE ACCESS METHOD |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-06-04 04:28:05 | Re: Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored? |