Re: Two patches to speed up pg_rewind.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Paul Guo <guopa(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Two patches to speed up pg_rewind.
Date: 2021-06-02 05:20:10
Message-ID: YLcVCgnXTKidYfvG@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 05:30:51AM +0000, Paul Guo wrote:
> Did some small modification and rebased the code. See attached for the new version.

Regarding patch 0002, I find the inter-dependencies between
write_target_range() and copy_target_range() a bit confusing. There
is also a bit of duplication for dry_run, fetch_done and the progress
reporting. Perhaps it would be cleaner to have a fallback
implementation of copy_file_range() in src/port/ and reduce the
footprint of the patch in pg_rewind?

Note: FreeBSD 13~ has support for copy_file_range(), nice.. Adding
Thomas in CC in case I am missing something.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-06-02 05:23:22 Re: Alias collision in `refresh materialized view concurrently`
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-06-02 05:05:44 Re: Speed up pg_checksums in cases where checksum already set