| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Mathis Rudolf <mathis(dot)rudolf(at)credativ(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Alias collision in `refresh materialized view concurrently` | 
| Date: | 2021-06-02 01:03:38 | 
| Message-ID: | YLbYpgQNXaXk0vws@paquier.xyz | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:30:55PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I wondered if we could find a way to make identifiers that regular
> queries are prohibited from using, at least by documentation.  You
> could take advantage of the various constraints on unquoted
> identifiers in the standard (for example, something involving $), but
> it does seem a shame to remove the ability for users to put absolutely
> anything except NUL in quoted identifiers.  I do wonder if at least
> using something like _$mv would be slightly more principled than
> pg_mv_1234, since nothing says pg_XXX is reserved (except in some very
> specific places like schema names), and the number on the end seems a
> bit cargo-cultish.
Yeah, using an underscore at the beginning of the name would have the
advantage to mark the relation as an internal thing.
+                    "(SELECT %s.tid FROM %s %s "
+                    "WHERE %s.tid IS NOT NULL "
+                    "AND %s.%s IS NULL)",
Anyway, I have another problem with the patch: readability.  It
becomes really hard for one to guess to which object or alias portions
of the internal queries refer to, especially with a total of five 
temporary names lying around.  I think that you should drop the
business with make_temptable_name_n(), and just append those extra
underscores and uses of MyProcPid directly in the query string.  The
surroundings of quote_qualified_identifier() require two extra printf
calls, but that does not sound bad to me compared to the long-term
maintenance of those queries.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-06-02 01:10:09 | ALTER SUBSCRIPTION REFRESH PUBLICATION has default copy_data = true? | 
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-06-02 00:30:55 | Re: Alias collision in `refresh materialized view concurrently` |