Re: What is lurking in the shadows?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What is lurking in the shadows?
Date: 2021-05-18 02:25:37
Message-ID: YKMloRln/dRM92fO@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:08:57PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
> Yeah, I would like to work my way through all of these warnings in my
> spare time and report back to this thread (after 1-2 months?) with a
> detailed analysis.

The next commit fest is at the beginning of July, so there are a
couple of weeks of margin here.

> After that it should become much clearer what / if any action should
> be taken next.

If you can dive into the details, that would be nice! My take would
be to look first at the local-local conflicts and rename all the
variables that conflict so as any backpatch done in the areas changed
cause a compilation failure. Some of the global-local conflicts are
simple enough to solve, these could go second. Each of them requires
a case-by-case lookup, of course.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-05-18 02:26:34 Re: What is lurking in the shadows?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-05-18 02:20:49 Re: Addition of authenticated ID to pg_stat_activity